6 Tips For Evaluating A Stock Market Newsletters Performance
Many stock market newsletters look great when you read their marketing
literature, especially when it comes to performance claims. By knowing what to
look for, you can weed out the bad from the good. Here are 6 easy ways to tell
if the stock market newsletter you are investigating is more about marketing hype
than actual stock market performance, and how confident the publisher is in their
product.
1. Review Their Past Trades
Many stock market newsletters will show you selected trade recommendations that
did great in their marketing literature and on their web sites. As an informed
investor, you should look past this obvious marketing hype, and look at their
entire trading history. Most credible newsletters offer this data to potential
subscribers. Also, make sure that they don't just throw a bunch of individual
trade data at you, they should offer that level of detail, as well as at least
monthly tabulations of how ALL of their stock recommendations performed together
in a portfolio (the way they would have you trade their recommendations). If
they have several model portfolios, then each one should have it’s performance
data cataloged separately. An easy way to tell if an stock market newsletter is
more about marketing hype than actual stock market performance is to see how
easily you can get this data from them. They do have the data, and if it was at
all compelling, it would be highlighted all over their marketing literature, not
just a few trades that did well. After all, if they've spent a ton of money
setting up expensive web sites, and sending out thousands of direct mail pieces,
it would be pretty easy to include a table or a graph of how ALL of their
recommendations have done since they started publication. If you can't get this
data from them, it should set off warning bells - why won't they share it?
(Probably because you wouldn’t purchase their stock market newsletter if you saw
the data)
2. Find Out If They Invest Their Own Money In Their Systems
Some stock market newsletter publishers invest in their recommendations with
their own money, while others merely publish paper traded hypothetical model
portfolios. Paper trading is the practice of recording trade data based on a
price that could have theoretically been achieved on a particular trading day
(like a stocks opening or closing price), and using that to represent what a
stock could have been bought or sold at. Two significant problems with
paper-traded portfolios are that they do not always take slippage and
commissions into account. More to the point of credibility - if an stock market newsletter publisher is not confident enough to put their own money into their
recommendations, why should you be confident enough to put your money into their
recommendations?
3. Performance Claim Timing
When it comes to evaluating stock market newsletter performance, not only do
you want to see the publisher making real open market trades with their own
money to document their performance claims, you also want to know when they made
their trades relative to when you could have made your trades on their
recommendations. Lets say a newsletter publisher recommends buying XYZ stock,
and communicates it to their subscribers via a website, email, fax, telephone
hotline, regular mail, etc. Then, after they've sent the recommendation to their
subscribers, they immediately go out and buy XYZ stock in their trading account.
No problem there, right? WRONG! Depending on how they communicated the message
to their subscribers, they could be buying XYZ stock minutes, hours, or even
days before their subscribers buy XYZ stock. So here's the scenario - they buy
the stock before their subscribers, document the executed trade for their
performance claims, and then their subscribers all jump into the stock and send
it's price up. When it comes time to sell, the publisher also gets out first,
before their subscribers selling pushes the price of the stock down. Ideally,
you want to look for performance claims based on delayed entries and exits, so
the publisher is trading at the same time their subscribers could realistically
be trading the stock market newsletters recommendations.
4. Backtesting Results
Many well-intentioned stock market newsletter publishers start out as
individual traders who have bought historical stock data (fundamental and/or
technical), and then put together a trading system that works very well over
this historical database. They then go on to market the stock picks that their
system generates via stock market newsletters. The problem with this is something
called survivor bias, and the sad part about it is that the publisher of the
newsletter may not even know it exists in their system. Here's how survivor bias
throws off systems that are based on historical back testing alone. Many stock
market data providers sell an inexpensive disk containing a decade or more worth
of historical stock data. Most of the time, the data on the disk is limited to
historical data on stocks that are currently traded. This means that stocks
which are no longer traded are not in the database, only stocks that are
surviving today are in the database. Why are some stocks no longer traded? Some
are acquired by other companies, some are taken private by shareholders, and
many just go broke and go out of business. You can see how this impacts a back
tested system - the results of the back testing do not take into account how the
system would have dealt with companies that failed, they only take into account
how they would have performed with stocks that were strong enough to survive
until today. This may explain why so many stock market newsletters get launched,
and may have a brief record of outperforming the overall stock market, only to
roll over and significantly under perform the stock market later on. If you are
thinking about following a newsletter with great back tested results, MAKE SURE
their data was not affected by survivor bias.
5. Historical Results
Another area to be concerned with is the time frame that an stock market newsletters performance covers. The historical results should cover time frames
that have both bull and bear markets in them, as well as non-trending market
periods, so you can see how they performed in each scenario. Ideally, a
newsletters performance results, whether only back tested or with real trading,
should go back to at least the late 1990's. This will give you an idea of how
the stock market newsletter performs in raging bull and bear markets, as well as
trend less markets. Obviously, the more track record data you can review, the
better.
6. Risk Free Trials
Many stock market newsletters will give you a free trial period to try out
their service. Take them up on this, so you can see if their trading style fits
with yours. One problem with many stock market newsletters is that they require
you to give them a credit card or some other form of upfront payment, before
they will let you have your free trial. Many times they say you can try it for a
month, and then they will start billing you after that. This is more of a sales
gimmick than a risk free trial, in that some percentage of people who sign up
for the free trial and don't like the service will forget to cancel their
subscriptions, and will have their credit card billed (usually the publisher
will give a pro-rated refund upon request). Once again, this gets back to the
publishers confidence in their product - if they are really offering a value
added service, they should not need your credit card information before you get
to participate in their free trial. If it is a great value, you will buy it at
the end of the trial period.
As you can see, stock market newsletters, and their performance claims, need to
be evaluated carefully before committing your time, subscription fee, and stock market
capital, into their recommendations. Hopefully, this article has
given you a few more tools to use when evaluating an stock market newsletter.
Lee Franzen is the President of Growthstock.com, Inc., which has published a
web-based newsletter entitled The Growthstock Advantage Investment Newsletter
since 1997. In addition to publishing this stock market newsletter, Mr. Franzen
also manages a hedge fund. Comments and questions can be sent to lee@growthstock.com.
We highly recommend reviewing the Growthstock Advantage Investment newsletter:
http://www.growthstock.com
This is a "Shareware" Article
(what's that? read on...)
This article is shareware. Give this article
away for free on your site, or include it as part of any paid package as
long as the entire article is left intact including this notice.
Copyright © 2008 Lee Franzen.
1Past performance does not guarantee or predict future results. The Growthstock Advantage investment newsletter is not suitable for people seeking low to moderate risk investments. Consult your financial advisor before investing in any investment methodology or newsletter service.
Formerly published as Accelerated Asset Appreciation Advisory
Last Updated 6/2/07, © Growthstock.com, Inc., 2008
|